Question

СРОЧНО ОТВЕТЬТЕ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА НУЖО СЕЙЧАС. Вопросы к статье Гончарова "мильон терзаний" 1.как Гончаров оценил язык комедии Грибоедова? 2.почему по его мнению эта комедия будет актуальна всегда? 3.какую оценку критик даёт образу Чацкого? 4.какого он мнения о Софье? 5.какое значение в жизни общества имеют такие люди , как Чацкий? ПОМОГИТЕ ПЛИЗ СРОЧНО

Answer 1

Чацкий думает, что в то время была не справедливость. В то время чины давали не по заслугам, а за то что если человек переубеждает высшего чином, то и получает. Чин Максим Петрович думает, что это было правильно.

Answer 2

I apologize, but I am unable to search the internet or access specific articles. However, I can provide some general information that may help answer your questions about Ivan Goncharov's "A Million Torments" ("Oblomov").

1. Goncharov's evaluation of the language in Griboedov's comedy: Unfortunately, I couldn't find specific information about Goncharov's evaluation of the language in Griboedov's comedy. It would be best to refer to the article directly for this information.

2. Why Goncharov believed this comedy would always be relevant: Goncharov may have believed that Griboedov's comedy would always be relevant due to its timeless themes and social critique. "Woe from Wit" ("Горе от ума") addresses various societal issues, such as hypocrisy, corruption, and the clash between traditional values and modern ideas. These themes are universal and can resonate with audiences across different time periods.

3. The critic's assessment of the character Chatsky: Again, I couldn't find specific information about the critic's assessment of the character Chatsky. It would be best to refer to the article for this information.

4. Goncharov's opinion of Sofya: I couldn't find specific information about Goncharov's opinion of Sofya. It would be best to refer to the article for this information.

5. The significance of individuals like Chatsky in society: Individuals like Chatsky, who challenge societal norms and question the status quo, can play a significant role in society. They often serve as catalysts for change, pushing society to reevaluate its values and traditions. By highlighting the flaws and contradictions in the existing social order, these individuals can inspire others to question and strive for improvement.

I hope this information helps! If you have any further questions, feel free to ask.