Question

как отнеслись русские офицеры к предложению о выкупе Жилина и Костылина?как это характерезует их?как ведут себя Жилин иКостылин в плену?кому из них по твоему тяжелее?почему?как характерезует персонажей их диалог накануне побега?охарактеризуй поведение героев рассказа во время побега.из рассказа кавказский пленник

Answer 1

2..Когда Костылин узнал о выкупе, у него загорелиь глаза, так как он очень хотел домой, А жилин не стал тревожить свою боьню мать и подумал, что спраиться сам.

3.Костылин что и делал, только лежал и скулил, а Жилин то мастерил игрушки, то помогал людям, однажды даже вылечил больного, так же и думал о побеге.

4. Мне кажется что тяжелее было Костылину, так как он ничего не делал, а только скулил лежа на сене, а Жилин своим трудом получил доверие жителей и конечно к нему относится стали теплее.

5.Конечно же когда дело дошло до побега Костылин ничуть не обрадоался, только сказал, что за ним приедут и дадут выкуп, но Жлин друга не оставил.

6. Когда уже герои были в бегах, то Костылин скорым временем сдался, так как очень устал и все таки он был пухлым человеком, но в первые минуты, Жилин не оставил своего товарища, он его нес на руках или на спине (точно не  помню). Но Костылина все таки поймали, а Жилина нет, потому что он увидел воих товарищей и позвал напомнощь, а те услышали и спасли Жилина.

Answer 2

Russian Officers' Reaction to the Ransom Offer for Zhilin and Kostylin

In the story "The Prisoner of the Caucasus" (also known as "The Captive of the Caucasus" or "The Caucasian Prisoner"), written by Leo Tolstoy, the Russian officers initially reacted with skepticism and disbelief to the idea of paying a ransom for Zhilin and Kostylin, who were Russian soldiers captured by the Chechens. The officers considered it a waste of resources and believed that it would set a dangerous precedent for future kidnappings. They argued that the soldiers should be left to their fate, as they had willingly put themselves in harm's way by venturing into enemy territory.

The officers' reaction to the ransom offer characterizes them as pragmatic and focused on the larger strategic goals of the military campaign. They prioritize the overall success of the Russian forces over the fate of individual soldiers. Their decision reflects a utilitarian approach, where the lives of a few soldiers are considered expendable for the greater good.

Behavior of Zhilin and Kostylin in Captivity

Zhilin and Kostylin, the two Russian soldiers held captive by the Chechens, initially find themselves in a state of despair and hopelessness. They are subjected to harsh conditions and mistreatment by their captors. However, as time passes, they adapt to their circumstances and develop a sense of camaraderie and resilience. They find solace in each other's company and support each other emotionally.

Zhilin, being the more experienced soldier, takes on a protective role towards Kostylin, who is younger and less experienced. Zhilin tries to keep Kostylin's spirits up and encourages him to stay strong. Despite the difficult conditions, they manage to maintain a sense of dignity and courage.

The Burden of Captivity: Zhilin vs. Kostylin

In terms of who bears a heavier burden in captivity, it can be argued that Kostylin, the younger and less experienced soldier, may find the situation more challenging. Kostylin is portrayed as vulnerable and impressionable, and he relies heavily on Zhilin for emotional support and guidance. The weight of captivity and the uncertainty of their fate may weigh more heavily on Kostylin's shoulders.

On the other hand, Zhilin, being the more experienced soldier, is better equipped to handle the challenges of captivity. He takes on the responsibility of protecting and guiding Kostylin, which adds an additional burden to his own experience of captivity. However, Zhilin's experience and resilience enable him to navigate the situation with more strength and determination.

Characterization through Dialogue on the Eve of Escape

The dialogue between Zhilin and Kostylin on the eve of their escape reveals their contrasting personalities and attitudes towards their captivity. Zhilin is depicted as a pragmatic and resourceful individual who carefully plans their escape. He is focused on the practical aspects of the plan and emphasizes the need for caution and precision.

Kostylin, on the other hand, is more impulsive and emotional. He expresses his desire for revenge against their captors and is willing to take risks to achieve it. This contrast in their characters adds depth to their relationship and highlights their different approaches to the challenges they face.

Behavior of the Characters During the Escape

During their escape, Zhilin and Kostylin display bravery, resourcefulness, and determination. They face numerous obstacles and dangers but manage to overcome them through their ingenuity and teamwork. Their actions demonstrate their unwavering commitment to regaining their freedom and returning to their comrades.

Zhilin's experience and strategic thinking play a crucial role in their successful escape. He carefully plans their route, anticipates potential dangers, and makes quick decisions when faced with unexpected challenges. Kostylin, while less experienced, contributes to their escape through his courage and willingness to take risks.

Overall, the behavior of the characters in "The Prisoner of the Caucasus" reflects their resilience, camaraderie, and determination in the face of adversity. They exhibit the qualities of bravery and resourcefulness that are often associated with soldiers in captivity.