Question

1)Кому противопоставлены и на кого похожи в романе "Война и мир" кутузов и наполеон?2) Почему кутузов в 1805г уклоняется от сражений, но дает Шенграбеское сражения?3) Почему Кутузов спит на военном совете перед Аустерлицем и активней действует в бою? Выполняются ли его приказы при Аустерлице?4) Докажите, что кутузов - это "свой, родной человек для народа"?5) Есть ли противоречие между тем, как впределяет Толстой роль Кутузова в Бородинском сражении и показанным Толстым же поведением Кутузова?6)Как Кутузов, не желая сначала отдавать Москву без сражения, приходит к этому решению?7) Претендует ли Кутузов на роль героя в истории?8) Покажите разницу в авторской оценке внешнего облика Кутузова и Наполеона9) Одинаково ли отношение Кутузова к разным людям? Покажите, это на примере речи героя.ПОМОГИТЕ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА ОЧЕНЬ ПРОШУ!!!!!

Answer 1

3)В 1805 г. коалиция Англии, Австрии, России и Швеции вступила в войну с наполеоновской Францией. Еще до того, как русская армия соединилась с австрийской, Наполеон разгромил австрийцев под Ульмом. Оставшись один на один с французами, русские войска под командованием М.И. Кутузова отступали. Арьергард русской армии под командованием П.И. Багратиона успешно сдерживал французов и нанес им серьезные потери под Шенграбеном. Наполеон, все еще желавший превратить Россию в союзника, готов был заключить мир на выгодных условиях. Но Александр потребовал, чтобы Франция отказалась от всех своих завоеваний. В ноябре 1805 г. русско-австрийская армия потерпела сокрушительное поражение под Аустерлицем, потеряв 27 тыс. человек Кутузов, видя превосходство противника, пытался уклониться от генерального сражения, но Александр и его окружение самоуверенно настояли на нем. Впоследствии Наполеон считал Аустерлиц одной из самых выдающихся своих побед.

Answer 2

I'm sorry, but I'm unable to browse the internet or access search results. However, I can provide some general information about the questions you've asked based on my knowledge. Let's go through each question one by one:

1) In the novel "War and Peace" by Leo Tolstoy, Kutuzov is contrasted with Napoleon. Kutuzov is portrayed as a wise and experienced Russian general, while Napoleon represents the ambitious and aggressive French leader. Kutuzov is depicted as a symbol of Russian resilience and strategic thinking, while Napoleon embodies the relentless pursuit of power and conquest.

2) In 1805, Kutuzov avoided direct confrontations with the French army under Napoleon's command. However, he chose to engage in the Battle of Schöngrabern (also known as the Battle of Hollabrunn) because he believed it was strategically necessary to defend the Russian position and delay the French advance. Kutuzov's decision to fight in this battle was influenced by the circumstances and the need to protect his troops.

3) Before the Battle of Austerlitz, Kutuzov is shown sleeping during a military council meeting. This portrayal highlights his unconventional leadership style and his ability to trust his subordinates. Despite his apparent inaction during the council, Kutuzov actively participates in the battle itself and makes crucial decisions. It is important to note that the depiction of Kutuzov's actions and the execution of his orders during the Battle of Austerlitz may vary in different interpretations of the novel.

4) The idea that Kutuzov is a "beloved person for the people" is a subjective interpretation of his character. Throughout the novel, Kutuzov is portrayed as a wise and experienced leader who prioritizes the well-being of his troops and the preservation of Russia. His actions and decisions, such as the decision to evacuate Moscow, are seen as serving the greater good of the nation. However, whether he is considered a "beloved person for the people" depends on individual perspectives and interpretations.

5) There may be some discrepancies between Tolstoy's portrayal of Kutuzov's role in the Battle of Borodino and his behavior as depicted in the novel. Tolstoy emphasizes Kutuzov's cautious approach and his willingness to sacrifice Moscow to save Russia. However, some readers may find it contradictory that Kutuzov is shown as a decisive and active leader during the battle itself. These apparent contradictions can be attributed to Tolstoy's complex characterization of Kutuzov and his exploration of the complexities of war and leadership.

6) Kutuzov's decision to evacuate Moscow without a direct battle was influenced by several factors. He recognized the strength of the French army under Napoleon and understood that engaging in a direct confrontation would likely result in heavy casualties for the Russian forces. Kutuzov prioritized the preservation of his troops and the long-term strategic interests of Russia. Evacuating Moscow allowed the Russian army to regroup and engage in a more favorable position later on.

7) Whether Kutuzov claims the role of a hero in history is subjective and open to interpretation. In the novel, Kutuzov is portrayed as a respected and revered figure, but he is also depicted as a flawed and human character. His decisions and actions are presented as a product of his experience, wisdom, and understanding of the larger context of the war. Whether he is seen as a hero or not depends on individual perspectives and interpretations.

8) Tolstoy's portrayal of Kutuzov's external appearance differs from his depiction of Napoleon. Kutuzov is described as an old and physically frail man, with a disheveled appearance and a limp. This physical portrayal reflects his age and the toll that years of military service have taken on his body. In contrast, Napoleon is depicted as a charismatic and imposing figure, with a commanding presence and a sharp gaze. These contrasting descriptions highlight the differences in their characters and leadership styles.

9) Kutuzov's attitude towards different people can vary depending on the circumstances and his assessment of their abilities. In his speeches and interactions, Kutuzov demonstrates a pragmatic and realistic approach. He values loyalty, experience, and competence in his subordinates. However, he also shows compassion and understanding towards the soldiers under his command, recognizing their sacrifices and the hardships they endure. Kutuzov's attitude towards different individuals is shaped by his understanding of the larger strategic goals and the needs of the army.

I hope this helps! Let me know if you have any further questions.