Question

СРОЧНО ПОМОГИТЕ НАПИСАТЬ СОЧИНЕНИЕ!!!!!!!! Итоговое сочинение тема: месть является восстановлением справедливости или все же преступлением?​

Answer 1

Месть – это преступление или восстановление справедливости? Месть - это низкое, ужасное желание причинять боль людям, считая, что они этого заслуживают. Очень часто люди мстят тем, кто причинил им боль и страдания, хотят расплатиться с ними той же монетой, заставить почувствовать обидчика на своем месте. И хотя месть совершается из стремления к справедливости, это такое же проявление зла, которое только усугубляет ситуацию.

Для доказательства этого приведу пример из романа М. Ю. Лермонтова «Герой нашего времени». Грушницкий не хочет принимать тот факт, что понравившаяся ему княжна Мери увлечена Печориным. Он наговаривает на Григория Александровича, оскорбляя его честь и достоинство. Конфликт между героями приводит к дуэли между Печориным и Грушницким. Попытка Грушницкого выиграть в нечестном поединке не удалась. Печорин настаивает на честной дуэли, в результате которой погибает Грушницкий. Такой финал взаимоотношений между литературными персонажами показывает, что месть Грушницкого подействовала против него же. Жажда отомстить врагу приводит к тому, что месть уничтожает собственную личность.

Answer 2

Introduction

The topic of your essay is whether revenge is a restoration of justice or a crime. Revenge is a complex and controversial subject that has been debated for centuries. Some argue that revenge is a natural response to injustice and serves as a way to restore balance and seek justice. Others believe that revenge only perpetuates a cycle of violence and is morally wrong. In this essay, we will explore both perspectives and provide arguments for each side.

Revenge as a Restoration of Justice

Those who argue that revenge is a restoration of justice believe that it is a natural human response to seek retribution for wrongdoing. They argue that revenge serves as a deterrent, sending a message that actions have consequences and discouraging future acts of injustice. Additionally, revenge can provide a sense of closure and satisfaction to the victim, allowing them to regain a sense of control and power over their lives.

One argument in favor of revenge as a restoration of justice is that it can bring a sense of satisfaction and closure to the victim. When someone has been wronged, seeking revenge can provide a sense of justice and retribution. It allows the victim to regain a sense of power and control over their lives, as they are no longer passive recipients of harm but active agents seeking justice.

Another argument is that revenge serves as a deterrent, discouraging future acts of injustice. When individuals see that there are consequences for their actions, they may think twice before engaging in harmful behavior. This can contribute to a more just and peaceful society.

Revenge as a Crime

On the other hand, there are those who argue that revenge is a crime and should not be condoned. They believe that revenge perpetuates a cycle of violence and does not lead to true justice. Instead, they advocate for alternative methods of seeking justice, such as legal systems and restorative justice practices.

One argument against revenge as a restoration of justice is that it perpetuates a cycle of violence. When one person seeks revenge, it often leads to retaliation from the other party, creating a never-ending cycle of harm. This cycle of violence can have far-reaching consequences and prevent true reconciliation and healing.

Another argument is that revenge does not lead to true justice. While it may provide temporary satisfaction to the victim, it does not address the root causes of the injustice or promote long-term solutions. Legal systems and restorative justice practices, on the other hand, aim to address the underlying issues and promote healing and reconciliation for all parties involved.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the question of whether revenge is a restoration of justice or a crime is a complex and multifaceted one. While revenge can provide a sense of satisfaction and closure to the victim, it also perpetuates a cycle of violence and does not lead to true justice. Legal systems and restorative justice practices offer alternative methods of seeking justice that aim to address the root causes of injustice and promote healing and reconciliation. Ultimately, the choice between revenge and seeking justice through legal means is a personal and moral decision that each individual must make for themselves.

Note: The sources provided did not contain specific information related to the topic. Therefore, the information provided in this response is based on general knowledge and common arguments surrounding the topic of revenge.