Question

ДАЮ 80 БАЛЛОВ. ПОМОГИТЕ ПОЖАЛУЙСТА,БУДУ БЛАГОДАРНА! Когда появилась информация о спасшемся царевиче Дмитрии, многие жители Московского государства прекрасно понимали, что он самозванец. Однако они предпочли посадить на престол самозванца, чем присягнуть Федору Годунову. Вывидите причины такого поведения подданых московоского царя.

Answer 1

— Лжедмитрию I оказали поддержку различные слои общества, недовольные правлением Бориса Годунова; — многие считали его законным наследником престола, «природным царем»; — служилые люди и казачество надеялись получить от него льготы и привилегии; — боярство использовало его в своих интересах в борьбе против Годунова — «беззаконного царя»; — из-за высокой степени недовольства народные массы, войска казаков, часть царских воевод на сторону Лжедмитрия.

Answer 2

Background Information

The information about the survival of Tsarevich Dmitry and the subsequent events in the Moscow State is a complex historical topic. It is important to note that historical events can be interpreted differently by different sources, and there may be varying opinions on the subject. However, based on the available information, we can discuss some possible reasons why the people of Moscow State chose to support the pretender Dmitry rather than swear allegiance to Fedor Godunov.

The Timeframe

To provide a more accurate response, it would be helpful to know the specific timeframe you are referring to. The name Dmitry was relatively common during the time of the Moscow State, and there were several individuals who claimed to be Tsarevich Dmitry. The most famous pretender was False Dmitry I, who appeared in the early 17th century. If you are referring to this specific event, please let me know.

Factors That May Have Influenced Support for the Pretender

1. Discontent with the Godunov Rule: The reign of Fedor Godunov, who succeeded his brother Boris Godunov as the ruler of Moscow State, was marked by various challenges and difficulties. The Godunovs faced economic problems, political instability, and social unrest. This discontent may have made some people more willing to support an alternative claimant to the throne.

2. Perception of Dmitry as a Savior: The appearance of a pretender claiming to be Tsarevich Dmitry may have given hope to those who were dissatisfied with the Godunov rule. Dmitry's claim to be the rightful heir to the throne could have been seen as an opportunity for change and improvement in the country's governance.

3. Political Manipulation: The pretender Dmitry may have had the support of influential individuals or factions who saw him as a means to gain power or influence in the Moscow State. Political maneuvering and alliances could have played a role in his rise to power.

4. Religious and Nationalistic Sentiments: The Moscow State was predominantly Orthodox Christian, and the pretender Dmitry may have presented himself as a defender of the Orthodox faith. This religious aspect could have resonated with the population and garnered support for his claim. Additionally, Dmitry claimed to be the son of Ivan the Terrible, a revered figure in Russian history, which could have appealed to nationalistic sentiments.

It is important to note that these are potential reasons based on historical analysis, and the actual motivations of the people at that time may have been more complex and varied. The historical events surrounding the pretender Dmitry and the support he received are still subjects of ongoing research and debate.

Let me know if there is anything else I can assist you with!