
В 1917 г. в феврале не нашлось ни одного полка, ни одного генерала, ни одной сколько-нибудь
значительной группы людей, которые встали бы на защиту Николая II, хотя до этого миллионы людей с воодушевлением пели "Боже, царя храни", а солдаты шли в бой за " веру, царя и отечество" Почему так произошло - царя смахнули с плеча "что пушинку" , а народу веками ему преклонявшемуся не оказалось до него никакого дела?

Ответы на вопрос




The Fall of Nicholas II in 1917
In February 1917, there was a significant shift in the support for Nicholas II, with no regiments, generals, or significant groups of people standing up in his defense. This was a stark contrast to the previous support he had received from millions of people who fervently sang "God Save the Tsar" and soldiers who went to battle for "faith, tsar, and fatherland." The sudden change in support and the subsequent fall of Nicholas II can be attributed to several factors.
1. Political and Social Unrest: The fall of Nicholas II in 1917 can be attributed to the widespread political and social unrest in Russia at the time. The country was facing significant challenges, including economic hardship, food shortages, and the heavy casualties suffered during World War I. These factors contributed to a growing dissatisfaction among the Russian population.
2. Ineffectiveness of the Tsarist Regime: The inefficiency and ineffectiveness of the Tsarist regime, coupled with its inability to address the pressing issues faced by the people, eroded support for Nicholas II. The government's failure to implement meaningful reforms and address the grievances of the populace further fueled discontent.
3. Influence of Revolutionary Movements: Revolutionary movements, particularly the Bolsheviks and other socialist groups, gained traction and support among the disillusioned population. Their promises of radical change and the overthrow of the existing order resonated with many Russians who were seeking a way out of the existing turmoil.
4. Military and Elite Abandonment: The lack of support from regiments, generals, and influential groups can be attributed to the erosion of confidence in the Tsar's leadership. The military and elite classes, who had previously been pillars of support for the monarchy, began to distance themselves from Nicholas II, further weakening his position.
5. Impact of World War I: The devastating impact of World War I on Russia, including heavy casualties, economic strain, and social upheaval, played a significant role in undermining the stability of the Tsarist regime. The war exacerbated existing problems and contributed to the overall discontent with the monarchy.
In conclusion, the fall of Nicholas II in 1917 was a culmination of various factors, including political and social unrest, the ineffectiveness of the Tsarist regime, the rise of revolutionary movements, and the impact of World War I. These circumstances led to a loss of support from key segments of society and ultimately contributed to the downfall of the Romanov dynasty.


Топ вопросов за вчера в категории История
Последние заданные вопросы в категории История
-
Математика
-
Литература
-
Алгебра
-
Русский язык
-
Геометрия
-
Английский язык
-
Химия
-
Физика
-
Биология
-
Другие предметы
-
История
-
Обществознание
-
Окружающий мир
-
География
-
Українська мова
-
Информатика
-
Українська література
-
Қазақ тiлi
-
Экономика
-
Музыка
-
Право
-
Беларуская мова
-
Французский язык
-
Немецкий язык
-
МХК
-
ОБЖ
-
Психология
-
Физкультура и спорт
-
Астрономия
-
Кыргыз тили
-
Оʻzbek tili