Question

На чью сторону - Витте или Плеве - вы бы встали, зная дальнейший ход событий? Почему?

Answer 1

Витте строил всю свою деятельность на мерах экономических и стремился поддержать лишь те общественные силы, которые, по его мнению, могли содействовать развитию хозяйственной жизни страны.Его бы я , пожалуй , и поддержал

Answer 2

On Whose Side Would You Support: Witte or Plehve?

If I were to take a stance between Witte and Plehve, considering the subsequent course of events, I would lean towards Witte. Witte's approach was more inclined towards reforms and negotiations, which could potentially have a more stabilizing effect on the political situation. Plehve, on the other hand, was known for his hardline and repressive policies, which might have escalated tensions and led to further unrest.

Witte's willingness to engage in negotiations and reforms could have potentially mitigated some of the underlying issues and tensions, whereas Plehve's approach might have exacerbated the situation, leading to more significant challenges and potential conflicts.

Considering the long-term implications and the potential for stability and progress, Witte's approach seems to align more closely with the interests of maintaining a balanced and stable political environment.

If you have any further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask!