Question

Немецкий музыкальный критик 19 века Ф.Рохлиц писал: «Два великих художника вдохнули в сознание детей своей эпохи новый дух… Микеланджело и Бах - вот имена наших героев, между которыми, пожалуй, можно не только обнаружить сходство, но и провести параллель». Поразмышляйте, что позволило критику сравнить Микеланджело и Баха, которых разделяли не только два века, но и разные виды творчества.

Answer 1

Иоганн Себастьян Бах – английский композитор Нового времени, играл на органе в немецких церквах, его поразительная по мощи и глубине музыка стала своеобразным мостиком от церковной музыки к светской. Именно ее новаторством во многом и объясняется то, что талант великого композитора был оценен далеко не сразу.
Леонардо Микеланджело – великий художник, скульптор, архитектор эпохи Возрождения. Главное для Микеланджело –величие и драматизм жизни человека, титаническое напряжение его борьбы.
Этих двух людей объединяет гениальность. Каждый из них смог дать своей эпохе самые лучшие свои творения и оставить свой след в истории навека. 

Answer 2

Comparison of Michelangelo and Bach

The German music critic F. Rohlic wrote in the 19th century that "Two great artists have breathed new life into the consciousness of children of their era... Michelangelo and Bach - these are the names of our heroes, between whom one can not only find similarities but also draw parallels." This comparison between Michelangelo and Bach, who lived in different centuries and practiced different forms of art, raises the question of what allowed the critic to make such a comparison.

The comparison between Michelangelo and Bach can be attributed to several factors:

1. Artistic Genius: Both Michelangelo and Bach were considered artistic geniuses in their respective fields. Michelangelo was a renowned Italian Renaissance artist, known for his sculptures, paintings, and architecture. Bach, on the other hand, was a German composer and musician, renowned for his compositions in the Baroque period. Their exceptional talent and mastery of their art forms made them stand out as great artists of their time.

2. Impact on their Era: Both Michelangelo and Bach had a profound impact on the cultural and artistic landscape of their respective eras. Michelangelo's works, such as the Sistine Chapel ceiling and the statue of David, were considered groundbreaking and influential in the Renaissance period. Similarly, Bach's compositions, such as his organ works and choral music, were highly regarded and had a lasting impact on the development of Western classical music.

3. Spiritual and Emotional Depth: Another aspect that may have led to the comparison between Michelangelo and Bach is the spiritual and emotional depth found in their works. Both artists were known for infusing their creations with profound religious and emotional themes. Michelangelo's works often depicted biblical scenes and conveyed a sense of grandeur and spirituality. Similarly, Bach's compositions were deeply rooted in religious themes and evoked a wide range of emotions through their intricate harmonies and melodies.

4. Enduring Legacy: Both Michelangelo and Bach left behind a lasting legacy that continues to influence and inspire artists to this day. Their works have stood the test of time and are still celebrated and studied by art and music enthusiasts worldwide. The enduring impact of their creations may have contributed to the comparison between the two artists.

In conclusion, the comparison between Michelangelo and Bach by the German music critic F. Rohlic can be attributed to their artistic genius, impact on their respective eras, spiritual and emotional depth in their works, and enduring legacy. Despite living in different centuries and practicing different forms of art, both artists left an indelible mark on the cultural and artistic history of humanity.