Question

Павел 1-реформатор или тиран?(ответ развернутый полный,с объяснением своей точки зрения)

Answer 1

В исторической памяти Павел 1 остался как деспотичный и взбалмошный правитель. я придерживаюсь той точки зрения, которая говорит, что Павел 1 - тиран.
Во-первых, придя к власти Павел начал многочисленные отставкии высылки из столицы многих приближенных царицы.  как писали современники о том, что приход Павла к власти напоминал государственный переворот.
Во-вторых, единственным источником справедливости Павел считал себя. в судебных делах он полагался только на чувства и эмоции. подобный подход к управлению страной приводил к произволу и непрдсказуемости.
таким образом, по моему мнению, Павел 1 является тираном нежели реформатором. 

Answer 2

Pavel I: Reformer or Tyrant?

Pavel I, also known as Paul I, was the Emperor of Russia from 1796 until his assassination in 1801. His reign was marked by a series of reforms and policies that have led to debates about whether he was a reformer or a tyrant.

Reformer: Pavel I implemented various reforms during his reign aimed at modernizing and centralizing the Russian state. These reforms included changes in the military, administration, and legal system. He also introduced the first Russian newspaper and established the first state bank. These actions are often cited as evidence of his reformist tendencies.

Tyrant: However, Pavel I's rule was also characterized by his autocratic and sometimes erratic behavior. His strict disciplinary measures and the imposition of his will on the nobility and the military led to discontent and opposition. His abrupt changes in policies and his conflicts with the nobility and military officers have led some to view him as a tyrant.

Conclusion: In conclusion, Pavel I's legacy is complex and open to interpretation. While he implemented significant reforms aimed at modernizing Russia, his autocratic rule and conflicts with the nobility have also led to perceptions of him as a tyrant. The debate about whether he was a reformer or a tyrant continues to be a subject of historical discussion and interpretation