Вопрос задан 21.02.2019 в 18:19. Предмет История. Спрашивает Шутова Анастасия.

Как О.Кромвель добился боеспособности парламентской армии?. Оцените порядки в английской армии, с

точки зрения человека XXI века. Что вы считаете жестоким, а что можете оправдать?
0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Курмет Айару.
Додати вiдповiдь no speak ukraine? No кiлолаi
0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Oliver Cromwell's Achievement of Parliamentary Army's Combat Readiness

Oliver Cromwell played a crucial role in achieving combat readiness for the parliamentary army during the English Civil War. Cromwell's military reforms and leadership were instrumental in transforming the parliamentary forces into a formidable fighting unit.

Cromwell's success in achieving combat readiness for the parliamentary army can be attributed to several key factors. Firstly, he implemented strict discipline and training regimens, ensuring that the soldiers were well-drilled and prepared for battle. Additionally, Cromwell emphasized the importance of religious fervor and ideological commitment among his troops, instilling a sense of purpose and unity within the ranks. Furthermore, his strategic acumen and innovative tactics, such as the effective use of cavalry, contributed to the army's combat effectiveness.

Evaluation of English Army's Practices from a 21st Century Perspective

From a 21st-century perspective, the practices and norms of the English army during Cromwell's time may be viewed through a critical lens. The hierarchical structure, rigid discipline, and emphasis on religious zeal may appear archaic and authoritarian by contemporary standards. The lack of emphasis on individual rights, diversity, and inclusivity within the ranks may be considered outdated and incompatible with modern principles of equality and human rights.

However, it is important to recognize that historical contexts shape military practices, and the evaluation should consider the prevailing norms and challenges of the time. While certain aspects of the English army's practices may seem harsh or unjustifiable from a modern standpoint, understanding the historical context is crucial for a nuanced assessment.

Perspectives on Cruelty and Justifiability

Cruelty: From a 21st-century perspective, practices such as harsh disciplinary measures, religious coercion, and the treatment of prisoners of war may be viewed as cruel and inhumane. The lack of regard for individual freedoms and the use of force to enforce ideological conformity can be seen as oppressive and unjust.

Justifiability: On the other hand, it is important to consider the prevailing norms and challenges of the time. The English Civil War was a period of intense ideological and religious conflict, and the military practices of the time were often shaped by the exigencies of warfare and the fervent beliefs of the combatants. In this context, certain actions, such as the enforcement of discipline to maintain order in the ranks and the prosecution of war to defend ideological convictions, may be seen as justifiable within the historical context.

In conclusion, while some aspects of the English army's practices during Cromwell's era may be viewed critically from a 21st-century perspective, a nuanced understanding of historical context is essential for a balanced evaluation.

Would you like to explore any other historical or military topics?

0 0

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории История

Последние заданные вопросы в категории История

Задать вопрос