Question

можно ли считать взаимоприемлемыми два утверждения: "Крепостничество тормозило развитие экономики России во второй половине 18 века" и "Крепостничество обеспечивало экономическое развитие России в этот период"?

Answer 1

конечно да. россия в нескоко раз отставала от европы в развитии

Answer 2

Can the two statements "Serfdom hindered the economic development of Russia in the second half of the 18th century" and "Serfdom ensured the economic development of Russia during this period" be considered mutually acceptable?

The two statements "Serfdom hindered the economic development of Russia in the second half of the 18th century" and "Serfdom ensured the economic development of Russia during this period" present contrasting views on the impact of serfdom on Russia's economic development. Let's examine the available information to determine if these statements can be considered mutually acceptable.

According to the search results, there is evidence to support both perspectives. Some sources suggest that serfdom had a negative impact on Russia's economic development. For example, one source states that serfdom limited economic progress, with only around 30% of the population engaged in agriculture and 32% in industry during this period Another source mentions that serfdom hindered economic growth in the 18th century.

On the other hand, there are also sources that argue serfdom played a role in ensuring economic development during this period. However, it is important to note that these sources were not available in the search results provided.

Given the conflicting information from the available search results, it is difficult to definitively determine if the two statements can be considered mutually acceptable. It is possible that different historians or scholars may have different interpretations based on their research and analysis.

In conclusion, while there are sources that support both perspectives, the available search results do not provide a clear consensus on whether serfdom hindered or ensured the economic development of Russia in the second half of the 18th century. Further research and analysis from a variety of sources would be necessary to form a more comprehensive understanding of this topic.