Question

10. Що спільного та відмінного було в зовнішній політиці Олега та Ігоря? Яке значення для Київської Русі (Русь-України) мали походи на Візантію? даю 50б​

Answer 1

Вот так нашел в интернете жду балов

Answer 2

Oleg and Igor: Similarities and Differences in Foreign Policy

Oleg and Igor were two prominent rulers of the Kievan Rus, a medieval state that existed from the late 9th to the mid-13th century in what is now Ukraine and parts of Russia and Belarus. While both Oleg and Igor played significant roles in shaping the foreign policy of the Kievan Rus, there were some similarities and differences in their approaches.

Similarities: - Expansionist Policies: Both Oleg and Igor pursued expansionist policies, seeking to extend the influence and territory of the Kievan Rus. They conducted military campaigns and launched expeditions to conquer neighboring lands and establish control over trade routes. - Relations with Byzantium: Both rulers maintained diplomatic relations with the Byzantine Empire, which was a major political and cultural power in the region at that time. They sought to establish trade agreements and secure favorable terms for the Rus merchants in Byzantine markets.

Differences: - Approach to Byzantium: Oleg and Igor had different approaches to dealing with Byzantium. Oleg, who ruled from around 882 to 912, is known for his successful military campaigns against Byzantine territories and his negotiation of the favorable trade agreement known as the "Treaty of Constantinople" in 911. In contrast, Igor, who ruled from 912 to 945, focused more on maintaining peaceful relations with Byzantium and consolidating the gains made by Oleg. - Relations with Other Neighboring Powers: Oleg and Igor had different approaches to dealing with other neighboring powers. Oleg, known for his military prowess, expanded the Rus territories by conquering and subjugating various tribes and principalities. Igor, on the other hand, faced challenges from the Drevlians, a neighboring Slavic tribe, and had to engage in military campaigns to assert his authority over them.

Significance of Campaigns against Byzantium for the Kievan Rus

The campaigns conducted by the Kievan Rus against Byzantium, particularly the expeditions to Constantinople (present-day Istanbul), had significant implications for the Kievan Rus and its development.

Trade and Economic Benefits: - The campaigns provided the Kievan Rus with access to valuable trade routes and increased opportunities for commerce. The Rus merchants gained access to Byzantine markets, which were known for their wealth and diverse goods. - The expeditions to Byzantium also allowed the Kievan Rus to establish diplomatic and economic ties with other regions and cultures, facilitating the exchange of ideas, technologies, and cultural influences.

Political and Cultural Influence: - The successful campaigns against Byzantium enhanced the prestige and power of the Kievan Rus. The Rus rulers could claim victories over a major empire, which elevated their status among other rulers in the region. - The interactions with Byzantium also exposed the Kievan Rus to Byzantine political and cultural practices. The Rus rulers adopted certain Byzantine administrative and legal systems, as well as aspects of Byzantine art and architecture, which influenced the development of the Kievan Rus civilization.

Religious Impact: - The campaigns against Byzantium also had religious significance. The Kievan Rus adopted Christianity from Byzantium in the late 10th century, and the expeditions to Constantinople played a role in fostering this religious conversion. The Rus rulers sought alliances with Byzantine emperors and the Byzantine Church, which facilitated the spread of Christianity in the Kievan Rus.

In summary, the campaigns conducted by the Kievan Rus against Byzantium had significant economic, political, cultural, and religious implications. They provided trade and economic benefits, increased the political influence of the Kievan Rus, and played a role in the adoption of Christianity.