Question

Почему в Персии и в Средней Азии не могли заимствовать македонскую тактику фаланги с длинными копьями?

Answer 1

Ответ:

В Средней Азии в древности большая часть войска состояла из ополчения, собиравшегося в случае войны, тогда как фаланга формировалась из хорошо  обученных воинов, прошедших подготовку.

Для эффективного использования македонской фаланги требовалось обучение и  длительный срок службы воинов, чего не было в Персии и в Средней Азии. Без создания постоянной армии, состоящей из хорошо обученных солдат, в  Персии и Средней Азии было невозможно использование македонской фаланги.

Не получавшие жалования и не обученные ополченцы были не готовы использовать тактику фаланги

Answer 2

#### The Macedonian Phalanx and its Tactics The Macedonian phalanx was a military formation developed by the ancient Greeks and perfected by the Macedonians under the leadership of Philip II and his son Alexander the Great. It consisted of heavily armed infantry soldiers called hoplites, who were organized into a tightly packed formation known as a phalanx. The phalanx was characterized by soldiers standing shoulder to shoulder in ranks, with each soldier holding a long spear called a sarissa. The Macedonian phalanx was highly effective in battle due to its disciplined formation and the use of long spears. The sarissa, which measured around 4-6 meters in length, gave the phalanx a significant advantage in reach over other infantry formations. This allowed the phalanx to engage enemies from a distance and maintain a defensive formation. #### Reasons for the Inability to Adopt Macedonian Tactics in Persia and Central Asia While the Macedonian phalanx proved to be a formidable military tactic, it was not easily adopted by other regions such as Persia and Central Asia. There are several reasons for this: **1. Cultural and Societal Differences:** The adoption of military tactics often depends on the cultural and societal context of a region. Persia and Central Asia had their own unique military traditions and strategies that were deeply rooted in their respective cultures. These regions had different military priorities and approaches, which may have made it difficult for them to fully embrace the Macedonian phalanx tactics. **2. Geographical and Environmental Factors:** The terrain and environment of a region can greatly influence the effectiveness of certain military tactics. The Macedonian phalanx was particularly suited for battles on open plains, where the tightly packed formation and long spears could be effectively utilized. However, Persia and Central Asia had diverse landscapes, including mountains, deserts, and rugged terrains, which may have limited the effectiveness of the phalanx formation. **3. Lack of Training and Resources:** The successful implementation of any military tactic requires extensive training and resources. The Macedonians invested significant time and effort in training their soldiers to fight in the phalanx formation. They also had access to abundant resources, such as high-quality weapons and armor. Persia and Central Asia may not have had the same level of training infrastructure or access to resources necessary to adopt and sustain the Macedonian phalanx tactics. #### Conclusion In conclusion, the inability of Persia and Central Asia to adopt the Macedonian phalanx tactics can be attributed to a combination of cultural differences, geographical factors, and the lack of training and resources. These factors played a significant role in shaping the military strategies and tactics of different regions, and the Macedonian phalanx was not universally applicable in all contexts.