Question

Известно, что советники Наполеона предлагали ему отменить в России крепостное право, чтобы завоевать союзников среди крестьян. Тем не менее, Наполеон не пошел на это. Почему?

Answer 1

Ответ:

Обеспечение армии продовольствием

Объяснение:

Отмени крепостничество В России, Наполеон не смог бы обеспечивать свою армию. Вот слово русского офицера А.Чичерина по этому поводу, - "Им отдают опять в управление крестьян, и таким образом задобренные пленники обещают нам, что если они будут охраняемы от мародеров, то и мы будем получать от них вино, муку, скот и фураж", - писал впоследствии один из участников таких экспедиций "по спасению помещиков".

"Жители не разорены, они добровольно предоставили все французам, устроили для них магазины фуража и продовольствия и по большей части сохранили свои дома и скот"

Answer 2

As of my last knowledge update in September 2021, there is no historical evidence to suggest that Napoleon's advisors proposed abolishing serfdom (крепостное право) in Russia to gain allies among the peasantry. It's important to note that historical events and decisions can be complex and influenced by multiple factors, and I cannot provide real-time information beyond my last update.

Napoleon's invasion of Russia in 1812 was a critical campaign during the Napoleonic Wars. The reasons behind his decision-making are subject to historical debate, but some possible reasons for not abolishing serfdom in Russia during his campaign could include:

1. Political Considerations: Napoleon's primary goal in invading Russia was to defeat the Russian forces and force Tsar Alexander I to accept Napoleon's terms. As the ruler of France, he may not have been keen on implementing domestic policy changes in Russia during the invasion.

2. Alliance with the Nobility: The Russian nobility (boyars) held significant power, and serfdom was a crucial aspect of their control over the peasantry. It is possible that Napoleon didn't want to antagonize the Russian nobility, hoping that they might be willing to negotiate or even switch sides.

3. Lack of Resources: Implementing such a radical reform in a foreign land during an invasion might have required significant resources and time that Napoleon couldn't afford to allocate during the campaign.

4. Uncertain Outcomes: Napoleon might have been uncertain about the reaction of the Russian peasantry to such a move. While it could have potentially gained him allies among the peasants, it could also have led to unrest or unintended consequences.

5. Strategic Objectives: Napoleon's primary strategic objective was to defeat the Russian army and secure control over Moscow and other key cities. His main focus was on military conquest rather than internal reforms.

It's important to remember that historical decisions are influenced by a wide range of factors, and without direct historical evidence, we can only speculate about the exact reasons for Napoleon's choices during the invasion of Russia.