Question

Насколько эффективной была деятельность Лиги Наций связанные с обеспечением международной безопасности ​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Ну, что можно сказать. Наверное, настолько эффективной как политика Англии и Франции по умиротворению агрессора. Реакция была вялой, например, Италии ничего не стоило взять и напасть (без оглядки на Лигу Наций) на Эфиопию.

Answer 2

The Effectiveness of the League of Nations in Ensuring International Security

The League of Nations was an international organization established after World War I with the goal of promoting peace, preventing conflicts, and ensuring international security. While it had some successes, its overall effectiveness in achieving these objectives was limited. Let's explore the factors that influenced the effectiveness of the League of Nations in maintaining international security.

1. Limited Membership and Influence: The League of Nations faced challenges due to its limited membership and influence. Not all countries joined the League, and some major powers, such as the United States, did not become members. This limited the League's ability to enforce its decisions and resolutions.

2. Lack of Military Power: The League of Nations had no standing army or military force of its own. It relied on member states to provide military support when necessary. However, member states were often reluctant to commit their forces, and this weakened the League's ability to take effective action in times of crisis.

3. Ineffectiveness in Resolving Conflicts: The League of Nations faced difficulties in resolving conflicts between member states. For example, during the Manchurian Crisis in the 1930s, the League's efforts to mediate between Japan and China were unsuccessful, and Japan ultimately withdrew from the League without facing significant consequences.

4. Limited Economic Sanctions: The League of Nations had the power to impose economic sanctions on aggressor nations as a means of deterrence. However, these sanctions were often ineffective due to the lack of universal participation and the ability of some countries to bypass them through trade with non-League members.

5. Failure to Prevent World War II: One of the League of Nations' most significant failures was its inability to prevent the outbreak of World War II. The League's response to acts of aggression by Germany, Italy, and Japan, such as the invasion of Ethiopia by Italy and the annexation of Austria by Germany, was largely ineffective. This failure undermined the League's credibility and highlighted its limitations in maintaining international security.

In conclusion, while the League of Nations had noble intentions and achieved some successes in promoting international cooperation, its effectiveness in ensuring international security was limited. Factors such as limited membership and influence, lack of military power, ineffectiveness in resolving conflicts, limited economic sanctions, and its failure to prevent World War II all contributed to its overall ineffectiveness.