Question

Правление Екатерины 2 было введено государственное регулирование цен на соль, которая являлась Одним из главных жизненно важных товаров. Сенат установил цену на соль в размере 30 коп. за 1 пуд и 10 коп. за 1 пуд в регионах массовой засолки рыбы.Однако правительство не ввело государственную Монополию на торговлю солью.Как вы думаете почему ? Ps:можно побыстрее​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Екатерина 2 рассчитывала на усиление конкуренции и улучшение, в конечном итоге, качества товара!

Answer 2

The Introduction of State Regulation on Salt Prices during Catherine II's Reign

During the reign of Catherine II, state regulation on salt prices was introduced in Russia. Salt was considered one of the essential commodities at the time. The Senate, the highest governing body in Russia, established the price of salt at 30 kopeks per pood (approximately 16.38 kilograms) and 10 kopeks per pood in regions where fish was extensively salted.

However, the government did not implement a state monopoly on salt trade. The reasons for this decision can be attributed to several factors:

1. Economic Considerations: The government may have recognized the importance of maintaining a competitive market for salt. By allowing multiple traders to participate in salt trade, it could ensure a steady supply and prevent price manipulation. A state monopoly might have led to inefficiencies and reduced competition.

2. Administrative Challenges: Establishing and maintaining a state monopoly requires significant administrative resources. The government may have deemed it more practical to regulate prices without directly controlling the entire salt trade. This approach would have allowed the government to focus its resources on other areas of governance.

3. Political Considerations: Catherine II's reign was marked by a series of reforms aimed at modernizing Russia. These reforms often involved a delicate balance between centralization and maintaining the support of the nobility and other influential groups. Implementing a state monopoly on salt trade might have faced opposition from powerful interest groups, making it politically challenging to enforce.

It is important to note that while these factors provide possible explanations, the exact reasons for not implementing a state monopoly on salt trade during Catherine II's reign may require further historical analysis and research.

Let me know if there's anything else I can help you with!