Question

100 баллов!!!!Помогитееее, прошу вас люди!!!!!!!!!Дам 100 баллов!!!!!Почему Индия выбрала путь сопротивления Англии без насилия?

Answer 1

Ответ:

Махатма Ганди (Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi). Все мы знаем человека, который привел жителей Индии к независимости в 1947 году. На протяжении всей истории люди боролись против своих угнетателей и почти всегда это означало обращение «к топору». Однако в 20 веке Мохандас Карамчанда Ганди предложил другой путь борьбы за свободу и достоинство – ненасильственное сопротивление – Сатьяграха.

Эта стратегия была обоснована не прагматическими соображениями (бесперспективность вооруженного противостояния колониальной армии), а проистекала из религиозно-нравственных убеждений великого индуса. Основная идея – в стремлении воздействовать на благоразумие и советь противника через:

1) отказ от насилия (ахимса);

2) готовность переносить боль и страдания

Answer 2

Why did India choose the path of non-violent resistance against England?

India chose the path of non-violent resistance against England for several reasons. Mahatma Gandhi played a pivotal role in advocating for non-violent resistance, also known as Satyagraha, as a means to achieve independence from British rule. This approach was based on the principles of truth and non-violence, aiming to resist oppression without using violence. Gandhi believed that non-violent resistance would not only lead to India's independence but also foster unity and moral strength among the Indian people.

Gandhi's philosophy of non-violent resistance was deeply rooted in the Indian cultural and religious traditions, particularly the concept of Ahimsa, which means non-violence or non-injury to living beings. This principle resonated with many Indians and provided a powerful moral and ethical foundation for the independence movement.

Furthermore, the non-violent approach was strategically chosen to gain international sympathy and support for India's cause. By demonstrating disciplined and non-violent resistance, India sought to portray the unjust nature of British colonial rule and garner global attention and solidarity.

Overall, India's choice of non-violent resistance against England was a multifaceted decision, driven by moral, strategic, and philosophical considerations, and it ultimately played a crucial role in India's journey to independence.