Question

Солнышки, кто нибудь,помогите!! Можно ли было,на ваш взгляд, предотвратить наступление периода раздробленности на Руси ? свое мнение объясните.​

Answer 1

Ответ:

Полагаю, что периода раздробленности Руси не удалось бы избежать. По крайней мере, это не удалось ни одному когда-либо существующему государству. Почему? Потому что отдельные земли ведут свое хозяйство, «кто чем богат», и это хозяйство развивается, земли богатеют, а значит хотят больше власти. Потому соревнуются, конкурируют между собой за право быть гегемоном и наиболее влиятельным князем или землей в составе Руси, или вообще быть отдельным и не ограничиваться нахождением в составе крупного государства. Борьба за власть – естественный процесс, который присущ человеку, это есть «борьба за выживание», и поэтому раздробленность – неизбежна.

Объяснение:

Answer 2

Could the period of fragmentation in Rus' have been prevented?

The period of fragmentation in Rus' refers to a historical period characterized by political disunity and territorial fragmentation in the lands of the East Slavs, which later became the foundation for the formation of modern Russia, Ukraine, and Belarus. This period lasted from the 12th to the 15th centuries.

Preventing the period of fragmentation in Rus' would have required significant changes in the political, social, and economic dynamics of the time. While it is difficult to definitively say whether it could have been completely prevented, there are several factors that contributed to the fragmentation and could have been addressed to mitigate its effects.

1. Succession Issues: One of the main factors contributing to the fragmentation was the lack of a clear and stable system of succession. The absence of a well-defined rule of succession led to frequent power struggles and divisions among the ruling princes. Establishing a more stable and accepted system of succession could have potentially prevented some of the fragmentation.

2. External Threats: External threats, such as invasions by Mongols and Teutonic Knights, also played a significant role in the fragmentation of Rus'. These invasions weakened the unity of the region and further exacerbated internal divisions. Developing a stronger defense system and forging alliances with neighboring powers could have potentially mitigated the impact of these external threats.

3. Economic Factors: Economic factors, including competition for resources and trade routes, also contributed to the fragmentation. The lack of a centralized economic system and the absence of strong trade networks hindered the development of a unified Rus'. Promoting economic cooperation and trade among the various principalities could have potentially fostered a sense of unity and reduced fragmentation.

4. Political Centralization: The absence of a strong central authority and the prevalence of decentralized governance structures also contributed to the fragmentation. Strengthening the authority of the Grand Prince of Kiev and promoting political centralization could have potentially prevented some of the divisions and conflicts among the ruling princes.

It is important to note that the period of fragmentation in Rus' was influenced by complex historical, cultural, and geopolitical factors. While addressing the above-mentioned factors could have potentially mitigated the effects of fragmentation, it is difficult to determine whether it could have been completely prevented. Historical events are often shaped by a multitude of factors, and alternative outcomes are speculative.