
Пересказ текста помогите сделать пожалуйста1Groups and individuals that represent the so-called
"anti-globalization movement" started in the late twentieth century. Their goal is to fight against corporate globalization of economic activity and prevent free trade between countries, which may arise from such activities.Members of the movement against globalization and generally try to protect the world's population and ecosystems from the fact that in their opinion, is detrimental consequence of globalization. Support for human rights is another corner stone of stumbling anti-globalization movement. They argue for the right to work, protection of the environment, feminism, freedom of migration, preservation of indigenous cultures, biodiversity, cultural diversity, food safety, and completion or reforming capitalism. The movement includes diverse and sometimes opposing philosophical processes of globalization, and holds alternative concepts, strategies, and tactics.Generally speaking, the protesters believe that the global financial institutions and agreements that they conclude undermine local decision-making methods. Many government and free institutions trade are considered as "acting for the benefit only of the transnational Corporation (for example, Microsoft, Monsanto, etc). These corporations are seen as having benefits that most human beings do not even have, for example, to travel freely abroad, obtaining the desired natural resources, and the use of a diversity of human resources. Then they can move on, and sometimes cause permanent damage to the environment, culture and economy, therefore, the impossibility of life for the citizens of this country is actually the case themselves. Activists also argue that Corporations impose a kind of "global monoculture".Common goals include the world Bank (WB), international monetary Fund (IMF), the Organization for economic cooperation and development (OECD) and world trade organization (WTO). In light of the economic gap between rich and poor countries, anti-globalists he claimed that "free trade" actually will strengthen the power of the industrialized countries.Activists argue that if the borders are opened up to large international corporations, they should similarly be open for free and legal migration and choice of residence for migrants and refugees. For these activists, as a rule, the goal of such organizations as the international organization for migration and the Schengen information system.In 2003, many of those involved in the movement showed a wide opposition to the war in Iraq. Many participants were among those 11 million or even more protesters on the weekend February 15, took part in the global protests against the war in Iraq and has been called "the second superpower of the world, "according to an editorial in the New York Times. Economic and military problems are closely linked in the eyes of many in the movement. Despite the lack of formal coordinating bodies, the movement was able to successfully organize mass protests on a global scale, with the use of information technology to disseminate information.One of the arguments that often arises on the part of the opponents of the movement against globalization is that, although protests against things that are widely recognized as serious problems, such as human rights violations, genocide and global warming, they rarely offer detailed solutions. Some of them also criticized for taking part in violent or destructive protests. In General, the movement's leaders, as a rule, should be encouraged for peaceful protest, as a more productive way to attract attention and respect for their goal, although sometimes the protests could escalate into violence

Ответы на вопрос




The "anti-globalization movement" emerged in the late twentieth century, comprising groups and individuals opposed to corporate globalization and the promotion of free trade between countries. Their primary objective is to combat what they perceive as the negative consequences of economic globalization on the world's population and ecosystems.
The movement is characterized by its commitment to protecting human rights, advocating for the right to work, environmental protection, feminism, freedom of migration, preservation of indigenous cultures, biodiversity, cultural diversity, food safety, and the reform or completion of capitalism. Activists within the movement subscribe to diverse and sometimes opposing philosophical approaches to globalization, holding alternative concepts, strategies, and tactics.
Central to the movement's ideology is the belief that global financial institutions and agreements undermine local decision-making processes. Many view governments and free trade institutions as serving the interests of transnational corporations, such as Microsoft and Monsanto. These corporations are perceived to possess privileges inaccessible to most individuals, including unrestricted international travel, acquisition of desired natural resources, and the utilization of a variety of human resources. Activists argue that these corporations can sometimes cause permanent damage to the environment, culture, and economy, adversely affecting the lives of citizens in affected countries. The movement contends that corporations impose a "global monoculture," contributing to the loss of cultural diversity.
Common targets of the anti-globalization movement include institutions like the World Bank (WB), International Monetary Fund (IMF), Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and World Trade Organization (WTO). Activists argue that the economic gap between rich and poor countries is exacerbated by free trade, strengthening the power of industrialized nations.
The movement also advocates for open borders for large international corporations to be accompanied by free and legal migration options for individuals, including migrants and refugees. Organizations like the International Organization for Migration and the Schengen Information System are seen as aligning with the movement's goals.
In 2003, the movement expressed widespread opposition to the war in Iraq. Many participants, numbering in the millions, joined global protests against the war, earning the characterization of being the "second superpower of the world" by the New York Times. The movement believes in the interconnectedness of economic and military issues and, despite lacking formal coordinating bodies, has successfully organized mass protests on a global scale, leveraging information technology to facilitate communication and coordination.


Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Английский язык
Последние заданные вопросы в категории Английский язык
-
Математика
-
Литература
-
Алгебра
-
Русский язык
-
Геометрия
-
Английский язык
-
Химия
-
Физика
-
Биология
-
Другие предметы
-
История
-
Обществознание
-
Окружающий мир
-
География
-
Українська мова
-
Информатика
-
Українська література
-
Қазақ тiлi
-
Экономика
-
Музыка
-
Право
-
Беларуская мова
-
Французский язык
-
Немецкий язык
-
МХК
-
ОБЖ
-
Психология
-
Физкультура и спорт
-
Астрономия
-
Кыргыз тили
-
Оʻzbek tili