Вопрос задан 21.11.2023 в 22:29. Предмет Английский язык. Спрашивает Чёрный Саша.

5 Colin would never ignore you deliberately - he (see) you. 6 There's no point going to the

chemist's (close). now - it
0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Маркова Ксения.

Ответ:

Colin would never ignore you deliberately - he sees you. (Present simple)

There's no point going to the chemist's now - it's close. (Present simple)

Объяснение:

0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

It seems like your text is a bit fragmented, and there might be some missing information or typos. However, I'll do my best to interpret and provide information based on the context given.

1. "5 Colin would never ignore you deliberately - he (see) you."

This sentence seems to suggest that Colin would never intentionally ignore someone, and it implies that he can see the person. The phrase "he (see)" might be a typo, and it could be "he sees" or "he's seeing" to form a grammatically correct sentence. So, the corrected sentence could be:

"Colin would never ignore you deliberately - he sees you."

This implies that Colin is aware of the person and would not purposefully ignore them.

2. "6 There's no point going to the chemist's (close) now - it"

It appears that there might be a missing word or phrase in the parentheses. If we assume it's "closed," the sentence could be:

"There's no point going to the chemist's (closed) now - it's closed."

This means that there is no reason to go to the chemist (pharmacy) at the moment because it is closed.

0 0

Похожие вопросы

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Английский язык

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Английский язык

Задать вопрос