Question

6 Speak CLASS DEBATE Look at the statement below and then work in two groups. Group A should argue against the statement. Group B should argue for it. Watching a live performance is better than watching the same event on TV. Think about: cost type of show how comfortable you are atmosphere ▸ the view sound the behaviour of other people 95​

Answer 1

A live performance is better than a TV performance. when you are surrounded by people and see the scene in front of your eyes, you experience emotions stronger than the emotions that you experience watching it on TV. after the performance, you can take an autogoaf from the artist or take a picture with him, if you watch the performance on TV, this will not work. also by choosing a live performance and not watching on TV, we can see something that will not be shown later on the TV channel. so it's better to go to live performances than to watch them on TV

Answer 2

Watching a live performance vs. watching the same event on TV

The statement suggests a debate between two groups, Group A and Group B, on whether watching a live performance is better than watching the same event on TV. Group A will argue against the statement, while Group B will argue for it. Let's explore some points that each group can consider in their arguments.

Group A: Arguing against the statement

Group A can present the following points to argue against the statement:

1. Cost: Watching a live performance can be more expensive than watching the same event on TV. Attending live performances often involves purchasing tickets, which can be costly, especially for popular events. On the other hand, watching the event on TV is usually free or requires a lower cost, such as a cable or streaming subscription.

2. Comfort: Watching a live performance may not provide the same level of comfort as watching it on TV. Live performances often require sitting or standing for extended periods, which can be physically tiring. Additionally, the seating arrangements may not be as comfortable as one's own couch or home environment.

3. View and sound: The view and sound quality of a live performance can vary depending on the seating location and the venue's acoustics. Some seats may offer a limited view or poor sound quality, which can affect the overall experience. In contrast, watching the event on TV provides a consistent view and sound quality, ensuring a better visual and auditory experience for the audience.

4. Behaviour of other people: Attending a live performance means being surrounded by a crowd of people, whose behavior can sometimes be disruptive or distracting. This can include talking, cheering, or even blocking the view. Watching the event on TV allows for a more controlled environment, where the viewer can focus solely on the performance without external distractions.

Group B: Arguing for the statement

Group B can present the following points to argue for the statement:

1. Atmosphere: Watching a live performance offers a unique atmosphere that cannot be replicated through a TV broadcast. The energy and excitement of being in a live audience, sharing the experience with others, and feeling the performers' presence can enhance the overall enjoyment and emotional connection to the event.

2. Type of show: Certain types of shows, such as concerts or theater performances, are specifically designed for live audiences. The performers may interact with the audience, creating a sense of engagement and participation that cannot be fully captured on TV. The live atmosphere adds an element of spontaneity and unpredictability, making each performance a one-of-a-kind experience.

3. Social aspect: Attending a live performance allows for social interactions and the opportunity to connect with like-minded individuals who share a passion for the event. It provides a chance to meet new people, discuss the performance, and create lasting memories together. Watching the event on TV may lack this social aspect and the sense of community that comes with being part of a live audience.

4. Supporting the arts: By attending live performances, individuals contribute to the sustainability of the performing arts industry. Ticket sales and audience attendance are crucial for artists, performers, and production companies to continue creating and showcasing their work. Supporting live performances helps ensure the growth and vitality of the arts community.

In conclusion, both watching a live performance and watching the same event on TV have their own advantages and considerations. Group A argues that watching on TV can be more cost-effective, comfortable, and provide a consistent view and sound quality. On the other hand, Group B emphasizes the unique atmosphere, social interactions, and the support for the arts that come with attending live performances. Ultimately, the preference between the two depends on individual preferences, the type of event, and the overall experience one seeks.