Question

Today, some scientists argue that cloning experiments should not be subject to state control. What is your opinion? Should governments oversee research on human cloning&

Answer 1

By scientists cloning (production of genetic copies) of animals raises the question of admissibility and the possible consequences of human cloning. The realization of this idea, protested by many people around the world can become destructive to society. Cloning an even greater extent than other reproductive technologies, opens the possibility of manipulation of the genetic component of the personality and contributes to its further devaluation. Person is not entitled to claim the role of the creator of his likes or to choose their genetic prototypes, thus determining their personal characteristics at his discretion. The idea of ​​cloning is a definite challenge to the very nature of man, inherent in him the image of God, part of which are the freedom and uniqueness of the individual. "Duplication" people with specified parameters can appear welcome only to adherents of totalitarian ideologies.I do not believe that the state should follow this.Cloning of human beings can corrupt the natural foundations of childbirth, consanguinity, motherhood and fatherhood. A child can become a sister of her mother, brother or father daughter grandfather. Are extremely dangerous and psychological consequences of cloning. A man came to being as a result of this procedure, can feel not like an independent person but only a "copy" of someone living or formerly living people. It should also be borne in mind that the "side-effects" experiments with human cloning inevitably would become numerous unfulfilled lives and, most likely, the birth of a large number of non-viable offspring. However, cloning of isolated cells and tissues is not an encroachment on the dignity of the individual, and in some cases has proved helpful in the biological and medical practice.

Answer 2

As an AI language model, I don't have personal opinions or beliefs. However, I can provide you with some insights on the topic of whether governments should oversee research on human cloning. The question of whether governments should oversee research on human cloning is a complex and controversial one. There are arguments both in favor of and against state control over cloning experiments. Here are a few points to consider: #### Arguments in favor of government oversight: 1. **Ethical considerations**: Human cloning raises significant ethical concerns, such as the potential for exploitation, violation of human rights, and the creation of individuals as mere commodities. Government oversight can help ensure that ethical guidelines and regulations are in place to protect the well-being and dignity of individuals involved in cloning experiments. 2. **Safety and risk assessment**: Cloning experiments can have unpredictable consequences and potential risks. Government oversight can help ensure that research is conducted in a safe and controlled manner, with appropriate risk assessments and safeguards in place. 3. **Public interest**: Cloning research has far-reaching implications for society, including medical advancements and potential applications. Government oversight can ensure that research is aligned with the public interest and that any potential benefits are maximized while minimizing potential harm. #### Arguments against government oversight: 1. **Scientific freedom**: Some argue that government oversight may stifle scientific progress and innovation by imposing unnecessary regulations and restrictions on cloning research. They believe that scientists should have the freedom to explore new avenues of research without excessive interference. 2. **International collaboration**: Cloning research is a global endeavor, and different countries may have varying regulations and approaches to oversight. Some argue that excessive government control could hinder international collaboration and the sharing of knowledge and resources. 3. **Private sector involvement**: With the increasing involvement of private companies in scientific research, some argue that government oversight may not be sufficient to regulate all aspects of cloning experiments. They believe that a combination of government oversight and industry self-regulation may be more effective. It is important to note that the opinions on this topic vary among scientists, policymakers, and the general public. The approach to government oversight of cloning research may also differ between countries and jurisdictions. Please keep in mind that the information provided above is a summary of different perspectives and does not represent a personal opinion.