Вопрос задан 07.10.2023 в 17:01. Предмет Английский язык. Спрашивает Линник Кирилл.

Ответьте на вопросы пожалуйста 1. Do you think it is better for a scientist to work on his own or

with colleagues? 2. Is natural curiosity a sign of a future scientist? Do you possess this quality? 3. Is it true that some famous scientists were quite mediocre in their childhood? 4. Do scientists have to work to meet deadlines? 5. What is your attitude to plagiarism in science and in studying? 6. Is it a good idea to use websites which seem dubious for your studies? 7. Who do you think is the most prolific scientist / inventor of all time?
0 0
Перейти к ответам

Ответы на вопрос

Внимание! Ответы на вопросы дают живые люди. Они могут содержать ошибочную информацию, заблуждения, а также ответы могут быть сгенерированы нейросетями. Будьте внимательны. Если вы уверены, что ответ неверный, нажмите кнопку "Пожаловаться" под ответом.
Отвечает Шашикян Армен.

1)Scientist better work with colleagues

2)Natural curiosity is a sign of a future scientist.No,I do not have this guality

3)Yes true

4)I think no

5)

I think that this is not right

6)No

7)Извините но на этот вопрос я не могу ответить


0 0
Отвечает нейросеть ChatGpt. Будьте внимательны, ответы нейросети могут содержать ошибочные или выдуманные данные.

Certainly, I can answer your questions:

  1. Whether it's better for a scientist to work on their own or with colleagues depends on the nature of their research and personal preferences. Collaborative work can often lead to more diverse ideas and expertise, while working alone can provide greater focus and autonomy. Many scientists engage in both individual and collaborative research during their careers.

  2. Natural curiosity is indeed a sign of a potential future scientist. Scientists are driven by a desire to understand the world and seek answers to questions. I, as a computer program, don't possess curiosity as humans do, but I am designed to provide information and answer questions to the best of my knowledge.

  3. Yes, it is true that some famous scientists were not exceptional in their childhood. Scientific achievement can develop and manifest at different stages of life, and childhood performance is not always indicative of future success. Albert Einstein, for example, was considered a slow learner in his early years.

  4. Yes, scientists often have to work to meet deadlines, especially when they are conducting research, publishing papers, or involved in grant-funded projects. Deadlines help ensure progress and accountability in the scientific community.

  5. Plagiarism is strongly discouraged in both science and studying. It involves presenting someone else's work, ideas, or words as your own, and it undermines the integrity of research and education. Ethical conduct and proper citation of sources are fundamental principles in both scientific research and academic study.

  6. It is generally not a good idea to use dubious websites for academic studies. Reliable and reputable sources are essential for accurate and trustworthy information. Using questionable sources can lead to incorrect or biased information.

  7. Determining the most prolific scientist or inventor of all time is subjective and depends on various factors, including the field of study and contributions. Some notable figures often mentioned in discussions about prolific inventors and scientists include Leonardo da Vinci, Thomas Edison, Marie Curie, and Albert Einstein, among others. Each of these individuals made significant contributions in their respective fields.

0 0

Похожие вопросы

Топ вопросов за вчера в категории Английский язык

Последние заданные вопросы в категории Английский язык

Задать вопрос