Question

1. Pet Doctor There's an old saying in the theatre world "Never work with children or animals". It's a pity that Herman Gross has never heard this piece of advice, or if he has, that he didn't pay attention to it. It's not so much that Pet Doctor is a bad film, although I can't really find many reasons for saying it's a good one. It's more that it makes me angry. Gross is a good actor. His appearance on the New York stage last winter in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet showed that he really can act. So what's he doing in this nonsense? It's a story about a small town doctor who finds he's making more money by looking after the local children's pets than he is by looking after humans. Then he gets into trouble with the police, because he doesn't have the right sort of licence to do this and, surprise, surprise, the children and their pets find a way to solve his problems. I won't say how, as it's the only part of the film that's even slightly original or amusing. If you have to see it, you'd be annoyed with me for telling you. But my advice is, when it comes to a cinema near you stay in and shampoo the cat. можете написать пересказ пожалуйста ​

Answer 1

Фильм "Pet Doctor" рассказывает историю о маленьком городе, где доктор вынужден заниматься лечением животных, чтобы зарабатывать больше денег, чем на лечении людей. В итоге он попадает в неприятности с полицией, так как у него нет соответствующей лицензии. Однако, дети и их домашние животные находят способ решить все его проблемы. Хотя фильм не так уж и плох, я не могу найти много причин, чтобы сказать, что он хорош. Главный герой фильма, актер Херман Гросс, действительно талантливый актер, но я разочарован его участием в этом бессмысленном фильме. Я бы не рекомендовал его к просмотру и советую лучше остаться дома и заняться чем-то более полезным, например, помыть кота.

Answer 2

Sure, here's a summary of the text you provided:

The text criticizes a film called "Pet Doctor" and questions why a talented actor named Herman Gross is involved in it. The reviewer doesn't necessarily call it a bad film but expresses anger about it. The movie revolves around a small-town doctor who discovers he can make more money by caring for local children's pets than treating humans. However, he faces legal trouble because he lacks the proper license for this practice. Eventually, the children and their pets come up with a creative solution to his problems, which is the only part of the film the reviewer finds slightly original or amusing. The reviewer advises people to stay home and do something else, like shampooing their cat, instead of watching this movie.