Question

Task 5. Make the correct form of Conditional sentences (0, 1, 2):  1) If Bob __________ (win) a million dollars, he would buy a new car. 2) If you freeze water, it ___________ (turn) into ice. 3) If Mary studies hard, she ___________ (pass) her exams. /3   III. Writing: Task 6. Write a for-and-against essay on theme: “Should government be responsible for public health?” (100-120 words). Use the plan: пж помагите!​

Answer 1

1)wins

2)turns

3)will pass

Answer 2

Task 5: Conditional Sentences

1. If Bob won a million dollars, he would buy a new car.
2. If you freeze water, it turns into ice.
3. If Mary studies hard, she will pass her exams.

Task 6: For-and-Against Essay

Should Government Be Responsible for Public Health?

Public health is a topic of great importance and debate. Some argue that the government should be responsible for public health, while others believe it should be left to individuals and private institutions. This essay will explore both sides of the argument.

On one hand, proponents argue that government intervention in public health is crucial. Governments have the resources and authority to implement large-scale public health programs, such as vaccination campaigns and disease prevention initiatives. They can also regulate industries that may harm public health, such as tobacco and junk food companies, through legislation and taxation. Additionally, government-funded healthcare systems ensure that all citizens have access to medical services, regardless of their income, promoting overall well-being.

On the other hand, critics argue that government involvement can lead to excessive regulations and a loss of individual freedom. They contend that individuals should have the autonomy to make their own health-related choices, even if those choices carry risks. Furthermore, government-run healthcare systems can be costly and may lead to long wait times for medical services.

In conclusion, the question of whether the government should be responsible for public health is a complex one. While government intervention can lead to better overall health outcomes and equity, it must be balanced with individual freedoms and cost-effectiveness. Striking the right balance is essential to ensuring the well-being of a nation's citizens.