Question

THINK! 7.C3 7.S3 If you were the farmer, would you take the gold the shepherd found? Why/Why not? Discuss in pairs.

Answer 1

Ответ:

If I were the farmer, I would consider the circumstances under which the gold was found. If the gold was found on the farmer's property, then legally, it would belong to the farmer. However, if the gold was found on public land or someone else's property, then the shepherd may have a claim to it. Additionally, I would consider the ethical implications of taking the gold. If the shepherd is poor and found the gold by chance, taking it may not be fair or just. On the other hand, if the shepherd had stolen the gold or obtained it through illegal means, then taking it may be justified.

Ultimately, the decision to take the gold or not would depend on the individual's values, beliefs, and moral code. It's important to weigh the potential consequences and implications of such a decision and consider the impact it could have on others.

Answer 2

If I were the farmer, I would carefully consider whether to take the gold the shepherd found. Let's explore both sides of the argument.

On one hand, the shepherd found the gold on the farmer's land. According to common understanding, anything found on someone else's property typically belongs to the property owner. Therefore, the gold would technically belong to the farmer. Additionally, the farmer may argue that they are the one who takes on the risks and expenses associated with maintaining the land, so any valuable discoveries should be rightfully theirs as a form of compensation.

On the other hand, it is important to consider the shepherd's role in finding the gold. The shepherd may have been vigilant, observant, or simply fortunate to stumble upon the treasure. Some people might argue that the shepherd deserves to be rewarded for their efforts, as they were the one who discovered the gold in the first place. Taking the gold without any acknowledgment or compensation for the shepherd's contribution could be seen as unfair.

Ultimately, the decision would depend on the relationship between the farmer and the shepherd, as well as the specific circumstances surrounding the discovery. It would be wise for the farmer to have an open and honest discussion with the shepherd to find a mutually beneficial solution. This could involve sharing a portion of the gold or finding another form of compensation to acknowledge the shepherd's efforts. By fostering a fair and respectful resolution, both parties can maintain a positive relationship and uphold principles of fairness and gratitude.