Question

Read and evaluate the essay on the topic “Robots will soon replace people in all jobs” according to the criteria. Give reasons for your evaluation. Robots will soon replace people in all jobs We live in a world where technologies are constantly developing. Many people generally agree that humans will soon be replaced by robots in all jobs. However, there is an opposing opinion. I am convinced that robots will not replace people in all jobs in a short period of time. Firstly, We do not have technologies that are able to substitute humans in the emotion-related workplace and it will take too long for technologies to become as sophisticated as needed to take teachers' place, for example. In fact, machines cannot provide emotional involvement as well as personal interaction in the classroom, unlike human. Moreover, journalists will also be in demand, as robots can write but no robot can act like a human when it comes to understanding the core of a story in order to find the truth. However, some people claim that soon robots will do all jobs instead of humans. For instance, nowadays robots can be found everywhere, even in operating theatres. They really can perform difficult tasks where a person would not be able to do it with the same preciseness. In conclusion, I would like to emphasise that in this day and age people will not be replaced by machines in all jobs in the near future. Your score for this essay – __________________________ Your reasons: __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Answer 1

Ответ:

Score: 6/10

Reasoning: The essay presents a clear argument that robots will not replace humans in all jobs in a short period of time, and provides two examples to support this argument. However, the essay lacks a strong thesis statement and does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the issue.

Furthermore, the essay could benefit from providing more evidence to support its argument, such as statistics or expert opinions. The examples given are relevant, but they do not cover all industries and job types.

Additionally, the essay could benefit from acknowledging and responding to potential counterarguments, such as the argument that robots will eventually become advanced enough to replace humans in all jobs.

Finally, the essay lacks proper structure and organization, making it difficult to follow the writer's train of thought. Overall, the essay presents a good start to the argument, but could benefit from more development and structure.

Answer 2

Ответ:

Объяснение:

I would rate this essay as satisfactory, but there is room for improvement. The essay presents two opposing views, which is good, but it lacks sufficient evidence and elaboration to support the arguments. The writer mentions emotion-related jobs and personal interaction in the classroom as an example, but there is no explanation of why these jobs require human involvement. Moreover, the writer does not provide any evidence to support the claim that robots cannot replace human journalists in understanding the core of a story.

The essay could be improved by providing more specific examples and data to support the argument. For instance, the writer could mention the limitations of current technology in terms of replicating human emotions or providing personal interaction. Additionally, the writer could provide data or studies that demonstrate how human involvement is critical in certain jobs, such as teaching or journalism.

Overall, the essay shows some potential, but it would benefit from more elaboration and evidence to support the claims.

Answer 3

Score for this essay: 7/10

Reasons for the evaluation:

1. The essay presents a clear introduction, body, and conclusion, demonstrating a well-structured format. It effectively addresses the topic of robots replacing people in all jobs.

2. The essay acknowledges the opposing viewpoint and considers both sides of the argument. This demonstrates a balanced approach and indicates critical thinking.

3. The essay provides specific examples, such as teachers and journalists, to support the claim that robots cannot replace humans in certain job roles. These examples add credibility to the argument.

4. The essay recognizes the advancements in technology, acknowledging that robots can perform tasks with preciseness that humans may not be capable of. This shows an awareness of the current capabilities of technology.

5. The essay, however, lacks specific evidence or data to support its claims. While it mentions emotional involvement and personal interaction as areas where machines fall short, it does not provide concrete examples or studies to back up these assertions.

6. The essay could benefit from expanding on the counterarguments and providing more evidence to support the claim that robots will not replace humans in all jobs. This would strengthen the overall argumentation.

7. The essay concludes by summarizing the main points and restating the position. The conclusion effectively wraps up the essay and reinforces the main argument.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a clear understanding of the topic and presents a well-structured argument. However, it could be further enhanced by providing more evidence and data to support the claims and by addressing counterarguments in more depth.